Wisconsin has no comprehensive surrogacy statute, but its Supreme Court held in Rosecky v. Schissel that a parentage agreement is generally enforceable except for provisions that attempt to contractually terminate parental rights, and only when enforcement is consistent with the child's best interests. Wisconsin's birth-record statute anticipates a circuit-court determination after a surrogate birth.
A path exists, but eligibility, agreement, genetic, residency, approval, or parentage requirements can materially limit who may use it.
Rosecky supports enforcement of parentage-agreement terms that do not contravene public policy or the child's best interests, but termination-of-parental-rights provisions cannot be privately enforced. Wisconsin law does not comprehensively regulate or guarantee compensation remedies.
Wisconsin has no statewide surrogacy-specific screening criteria. Independent counsel, medical and mental-health screening, prior pregnancy, insurance, expenses, escrow, and informed-consent protections should be documented rather than assumed.
Under Wis. Stat. § 69.14(1)(h), the initial record after a surrogate birth identifies the person who gave birth and omits the father; a new record follows a circuit-court determination of parental rights. Court-specific timing may include pre-birth preparation and post-birth final action, so the agreement alone is not a birth-certificate order.
Confirm venue, filing timing, evidence, and birth-record relief before transfer; Wisconsin's statute expects a court determination.
Do not rely on a contract clause to terminate parental rights; Rosecky treats those provisions differently from other parentage-agreement terms.
Because Rosecky involved traditional surrogacy, counsel should address the non-genetic carrier facts and requested parentage theory expressly.
Sequence matters. Use these steps to prepare for a conversation with qualified assisted-reproduction professionals.
Engage Wisconsin reproductive-law counsel before matching or transfer to draft around Rosecky, select the court procedure, and coordinate the post-determination birth record.
Wisconsin has no statewide surrogacy-specific screening criteria. Independent counsel, medical and mental-health screening, prior pregnancy, insurance, expenses, escrow, and informed-consent protections should be documented rather than assumed.
Complete medical, psychological, insurance, compensation or expense, and independent legal review before medication or embryo transfer. Rosecky supports enforcement of parentage-agreement terms that do not contravene public policy or the child's best interests, but termination-of-parental-rights provisions cannot be privately enforced. Wisconsin law does not comprehensively regulate or guarantee compensation remedies.
Under Wis. Stat. § 69.14(1)(h), the initial record after a surrogate birth identifies the person who gave birth and omits the father; a new record follows a circuit-court determination of parental rights. Court-specific timing may include pre-birth preparation and post-birth final action, so the agreement alone is not a birth-certificate order.
Review the linked statutes, court materials, public guidance, and clearly identified practice sources as a starting point for current legal review.
Laws, court practices, and local filing procedures can change. This page provides general educational information, not legal advice. Consult independent assisted-reproduction counsel licensed in the relevant state before relying on it.
Choose a city to open its local resource page.
